dly； Hesiod claims that his father if not he himself came from Aeolis and settled in Boeotia。 There is fairly definite evidence to warrant our acceptance of this： the dialect of the 〃Works and Days〃 is shown by Rzach （3） to contain distinct Aeolisms apart from those which formed part of the general stock of epic poetry。 And that this Aeolic speaking poet was a Boeotian of Ascra seems even more certain； since the tradition is never once disputed； insignificant though the place was； even before its destruction by the Thespians。
Again； Hesiod's story of his relations with his brother Perses have been treated with scepticism （see Murray； 〃Anc。 Gk。 Literature〃； pp。 53…54）： Perses； it is urged； is clearly a mere dummy； set up to be the target for the poet's exhortations。 On such a matter precise evidence is naturally not forthcoming； but all probability is against the sceptical view。 For 1） if the quarrel between the brothers were a fiction； we should expect it to be detailed at length and not noticed allusively and rather obscurely as we find it； 2） as MM。 Croiset remark； if the poet needed a lay…figure the ordinary practice was to introduce some mythological person as； in fact； is done in the 〃Precepts of Chiron〃。 In a word； there is no more solid ground for treating Perses and his quarrel with Hesiod as fictitious than there would be for treating Cyrnus； the friend of Theognis； as mythical。
Thirdly； there is the passage in the 〃Theogony〃 relating to Hesiod and the Muses。 It is surely an error to suppose that lines 22…35 all refer to Hesiod： rather； the author of the 〃Theogony〃 tells the story of his own inspiration by the same Muses who once taught Hesiod glorious song。 The lines 22…3 are therefore a very early piece of tradition about Hesiod； and though the appearance of Muses must be treated as a graceful fiction； we find that a writer； later than the 〃Works and Days〃 by perhaps no more than three…quarters of a century； believed in the actuality of Hesiod and in his life as a farmer or shepherd。
Lastly； there is the famous story of the contest in song at Chalcis。 In later times the modest version in the 〃Works and Days〃 was elaborated； first by making Homer the opponent whom Hesiod conquered； while a later period exercised its ingenuity in working up the story of the contest into the elaborate form in which it still survives。 Finally the contest； in which the two poets contended with hymns to Apollo （4）； was transferred to Delos。 These developments certainly need no consideration： are we to say the same of the passage in the 〃Works and Days〃？ Critics from Plutarch downwards have almost unanimously rejected the lines 654…662； on the ground that Hesiod's Amphidamas is the hero of the Lelantine Wars between Chalcis and Eretria； whose death may be placed circa 705 B。C。 a date which is obviously too low for the genuine Hesiod。 Nevertheless； there is much to be said in defence of the passage。 Hesiod's claim in the 〃Works and Days〃 is modest； since he neither pretends to have met Homer；
nor to have sung in any but an impromptu； local festival； so that
the supposed interpolation lacks a sufficient motive。 And there is nothing in the context to show that Hesiod's Amphidamas is to be identified with that Amphidamas whom Plutarch alone connects with the Lelantine War： the name may have been borne by an earlier Chalcidian； an ancestor； perhaps； of the person to whom Plutarch refers。
The story of the end of Hesiod may be told in outline。 After the contest at Chalcis； Hesiod went to Delphi and there was warned that the ‘issue of death should overtake him in the fair grove of Nemean Zeus。' Avoiding therefore Nemea on the Isthmus of Corinth； to which he supposed the oracle to refer； Hesiod retired to Oenoe in Locris where he was entertained by Amphiphanes and Ganyetor； sons of a certain Phegeus。 This place； however； was also sacred to Nemean Zeus； and the poet； suspected by his hosts of having seduced their sister （5）； was murdered there。 His body； cast into the sea； was brought to shore by dolphins and buried at Oenoe （or； according to Plutarch； at Ascra）： at a later time his bones were removed to Orchomenus。 The whole story is full of miraculous elements； and the various authorities disagree on numerous points of detail。 The tradition seems； however； to be constant in declaring that Hesiod was murdered and buried at Oenoe； and in this respect it is at least as old as the time of Thucydides。 In conclusion it may be worth while to add the graceful epigram of Alcaeus of Messene （〃Palatine Anthology〃； vii 55）。
〃When in the shady Locrian grove Hesiod lay dead； the Nymphs washed his body with water from their own springs； and heaped high his grave； and thereon the goat…herds sprinkled offerings of milk mingled with yellow…honey： such was the utterance of the nine Muses that he breathed forth； that old man who had tasted of their pure springs。〃
The Hesiodic Poems
The Hesiodic poems fall into two groups according as they are didactic （technical or gnomic） or genealogical： the first group centres round the 〃Works and Days〃； the second round the 〃Theogony〃。
I。 〃The Works and Days〃： The poem consists of four main sections。 a） After the prelude； which Pausanias failed to find in the ancient copy engraved on lead seen by him on Mt。 Helicon； comes a general exhortation to industry。 It begins with the allegory of the two Strifes； who stand for wholesome Emulation and Quarrelsomeness respectively。 Then by means of the Myth of Pandora the poet shows how evil and the need for work first arose； and goes on to describe the Five Ages of the World； tracing the gradual increase in evil； and emphasizing the present miserable condition of the world； a condition in which struggle is inevitable。 Next； after the Fable of the Hawk and Nightingale； which serves as a condemnation of violence and injustice； the poet passes on to contrast the blessing which Righteousness brings to a nation； and the punishment which Heaven sends down upon the violent； and the section concludes with a series of precepts on industry and prudent conduct generally。 b） The second section shows how a man may escape want and misery by industry and care both in agriculture and in trading by sea。 Neither subject； it should be carefully noted； is treated in any way comprehensively。 c） The third part is occupied with miscellaneous precepts relating mostly to actions of domestic and everyday life and conduct which have little or no connection with one another。 d） The final section is taken up with a series of notices on the days of the month which are favourable or unfavourable for agricultural and other operations。
It is from the second and fourth sections that the poem takes its name。 At first sight such a work seems to be a miscellany of myths； technical advice； moral precepts； and folklore maxims without any unifying principle； and critics have readily taken the view that the whole is a canto of fragments or short poems worked up by a redactor。 Very probably Hesiod used much material of a far older date； just as Shakespeare used the 〃Gesta Romanorum〃； old chronicles； and old plays； but close inspection will show that the 〃Works and Days〃 has a real unity and that the picturesque title is somewhat misleading。 The poem has properly no technical object at all； but is moral： its real aim is to show men how best to live in a difficult world。 So viewed the four seemingly independent sections will be found to be linked together in a real bond of unity。 Such a connection between the first and second sections is easily seen； but the links between these and the third and fourth are no less real： to make life go tolerably smoothly it is most important to be just and to know how to win a livelihood； but happiness also largely depends on prudence and care both in social and home life as well； and not least on avoidance of actions which offend supernatural powers and bring ill…luck。 And finally； if your industry is to be fruitful； you must know what days are suitable for various kinds of work。 This moral aim as opposed to the currently accepted technical aim of the poem explains the otherwise puzzling incompleteness of the instructions on farming and seafaring。
Of the Hesiodic poems similar in character to the 〃Works and Days〃； only the scantiest fragments survive。 One at least of these； the 〃Divination by Birds〃； was； as we know from Proclus； attached to the end of the 〃Works〃 until it was rejected by Apollonius Rhodius： doubtless it continued the same theme of how to live； showing how man can avoid disasters by attending to the omens to be drawn from birds。 It is possible that the 〃Astronomy〃 or 〃Astrology〃 （as Plutarch calls it） was in turn appended to the 〃Divination〃。 It certainly gave some account of the principal constellations； their dates of rising and setting； and the legends connected with them； and probably showed how these influenced human affairs or might be used as guides。 The 〃Precepts of Chiron〃 was a didactic poem made up of moral and practical precepts； resembling the gnomic sections of the 〃Works and Days〃； addressed by the Centaur Chiron to his pupil Achilles。
Even less is known of the poem called the 〃Great Works〃： the title implies that it was similar in subject to the second section of the 〃Works and Days〃； but longer。 Possible references in Roman writers （6） indicate that among the subjects dealt with were the cultivation of the vine and olive and various herbs。 The inclusion of the judgment of Rhadamanthys （frag。 1）： ‘If a man sow evil； he shall reap evil；' indicates a gnomic element； and the note by Proclus （7） on 〃Works and Days〃 126 makes it likely that metals also were dealt with。 It is therefore possible that another lost poem； the 〃Idaean Dactyls〃； which dealt with the discovery of metals and their working； was appended to； or even was a part of the 〃Great Works〃； just as the 〃Divination by Birds〃 was appended to the 〃Works and Days〃。
II。 The Genealogical Poems： The only complete poem of the genealogical group is the 〃Theogony〃； which traces from the beginning of things the descent and vicissitudes of the families of the gods。 Like the 〃Works and Days〃 this poem has n