tesy of the knights of old； they are anxious to furnish it with the same central power which they have found to be so trusty a weapon； in order to enhance the glory of their resistance to its attacks。
In America there is scarcely a hamlet which has not its own newspaper。 It may readily be imagined that neither discipline nor unity of design can be communicated to so multifarious a host； and each one is consequently led to fight under his own standard。 All the political journals of the United States are indeed arrayed on the side of the administration or against it； but they attack and defend in a thousand different ways。 They cannot succeed in forming those great currents of opinion which overwhelm the most solid obstacles。 This division of the influence of the press produces a variety of other consequences which are scarcely less remarkable。 The facility with which journals can be established induces a multitude of individuals to take a part in them； but as the extent of competition precludes the possibility of considerable profit； the most distinguished classes of society are rarely led to engage in these undertakings。 But such is the number of the public prints that； even if they were a source of wealth； writers of ability could not be found to direct them all。 The journalists of the United States are usually placed in a very humble position； with a scanty education and a vulgar turn of mind。 The will of the majority is the most general of laws； and it establishes certain habits which form the characteristics of each peculiar class of society； thus it dictates the etiquette practised at courts and the etiquette of the bar。 The characteristics of the French journalist consist in a violent； but frequently an eloquent and lofty； manner of discussing the politics of the day； and the exceptions to this habitual practice are only occasional。 The characteristics of the American journalist consist in an open and coarse appeal to the passions of the populace； and he habitually abandons the principles of political science to assail the characters of individuals； to track them into private life； and disclose all their weaknesses and errors。
Nothing can be more deplorable than this abuse of the powers of thought； I shall have occasion to point out hereafter the influence of the newspapers upon the taste and the morality of the American people； but my present subject exclusively concerns the political world。 It cannot be denied that the effects of this extreme license of the press tend indirectly to the maintenance of public order。 The individuals who are already in the possession of a high station in the esteem of their fellow…citizens are afraid to write in the newspapers； and they are thus deprived of the most powerful instrument which they can use to excite the passions of the multitude to their own advantage。 *a
＇Footnote a： They only write in the papers when they choose to address the people in their own name； as； for instance； when they are called upon to repel calumnious imputations； and to correct a misstatement of facts。＇
The personal opinions of the editors have no kind of weight in the eyes of the public： the only use of a journal is； that it imparts the knowledge of certain facts； and it is only by altering or distorting those facts that a journalist can contribute to the support of his own views。
But although the press is limited to these resources； its influence in America is immense。 It is the power which impels the circulation of political life through all the districts of that vast territory。 Its eye is constantly open to detect the secret springs of political designs； and to summon the leaders of all parties to the bar of public opinion。 It rallies the interests of the community round certain principles； and it draws up the creed which factions adopt； for it affords a means of intercourse between parties which hear； and which address each other without ever having been in immediate contact。 When a great number of the organs of the press adopt the same line of conduct； their influence becomes irresistible； and public opinion； when it is perpetually assailed from the same side； eventually yields to the attack。 In the United States each separate journal exercises but little authority； but the power of the periodical press is only second to that of the people。 *b
＇Footnote b： See Appendix； P。＇
The opinions established in the United States under the empire of the liberty of the press are frequently more firmly rooted than those which are formed elsewhere under the sanction of a censor。
In the United States the democracy perpetually raises fresh individuals to the conduct of public affairs； and the measures of the administration are consequently seldom regulated by the strict rules of consistency or of order。 But the general principles of the Government are more stable； and the opinions most prevalent in society are generally more durable than in many other countries。 When once the Americans have taken up an idea； whether it be well or ill founded； nothing is more difficult than to eradicate it from their minds。 The same tenacity of opinion has been observed in England； where； for the last century； greater freedom of conscience and more invincible prejudices have existed than in all the other countries of Europe。 I attribute this consequence to a cause which may at first sight appear to have a very opposite tendency； namely； to the liberty of the press。 The nations amongst which this liberty exists are as apt to cling to their opinions from pride as from conviction。 They cherish them because they hold them to be just； and because they exercised their own free…will in choosing them； and they maintain them not only because they are true； but because they are their own。 Several other reasons conduce to the same end。
It was remarked by a man of genius that 〃ignorance lies at the two ends of knowledge。〃 Perhaps it would have been more correct to have said； that absolute convictions are to be met with at the two extremities； and that doubt lies in the middle； for the human intellect may be considered in three distinct states； which frequently succeed one another。 A man believes implicitly； because he adopts a proposition without inquiry。 He doubts as soon as he is assailed by the objections which his inquiries may have aroused。 But he frequently succeeds in satisfying these doubts； and then he begins to believe afresh： he no longer lays hold on a truth in its most shadowy and uncertain form； but he sees it clearly before him； and he advances onwards by the light it gives him。 *c
＇Footnote c： It may； however； be doubted whether this rational and self…guiding conviction arouses as much fervor or enthusiastic devotedness in men as their first dogmatical belief。＇
When the liberty of the press acts upon men who are in the first of these three states； it does not immediately disturb their habit of believing implicitly without investigation； but it constantly modifies the objects of their intuitive convictions。 The human mind continues to discern but one point upon the whole intellectual horizon； and that point is in continual motion。 Such are the symptoms of sudden revolutions； and of the misfortunes which are sure to befall those generations which abruptly adopt the unconditional freedom of the press。
The circle of novel ideas is； however； soon terminated； the touch of experience is upon them； and the doubt and mistrust which their uncertainty produces become universal。 We may rest assured that the majority of mankind will either believe they know not wherefore； or will not know what to believe。 Few are the beings who can ever hope to attain to that state of rational and independent conviction which true knowledge can beget in defiance of the attacks of doubt。
It has been remarked that in times of great religious fervor men sometimes change their religious opinions； whereas in times of general scepticism everyone clings to his own persuasion。 The same thing takes place in politics under the liberty of the press。 In countries where all the theories of social science have been contested in their turn； the citizens who have adopted one of them stick to it； not so much because they are assured of its excellence； as because they are not convinced of the superiority of any other。 In the present age men are not very ready to die in defence of their opinions； but they are rarely inclined to change them； and there are fewer martyrs as well as fewer apostates。
Another still more valid reason may yet be adduced： when no abstract opinions are looked upon as certain； men cling to the mere propensities and external interests of their position； which are naturally more tangible and more permanent than any opinions in the world。
It is not a question of easy solution whether aristocracy or democracy is most fit to govern a country。 But it is certain that democracy annoys one part of the community； and that aristocracy oppresses another part。 When the question is reduced to the simple expression of the struggle between poverty and wealth； the tendency of each side of the dispute becomes perfectly evident without further controversy。
Chapter XII： Political Associations In The United States
Chapter Summary
Daily use which the Anglo…Americans make of the right of association … Three kinds of political associations … In what manner the Americans apply the representative system to associations … Dangers resulting to the State … Great Convention of 1831 relative to the Tariff … Legislative character of this Convention … Why the unlimited exercise of the right of association is less dangerous in the United States than elsewhere … Why it may be looked upon as necessary … Utility of associations in a democratic people。
Political Associations In The United States
In no country in the world has the principle of association been more successfully used； or more unsparingly applied to a multitude of different objects； than in America。 Besides the permanent associations which are established by law under the names of townships； cities； and counties； a vast number of others are formed and maintained by the agency of private individuals。
The citizen of the United States is taught from